Luqmani Thompson & Partners is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority : SRA number 00290208.
Luqmani Thompson & Partners
77/79 High Road
Wood Green
London N22 6BB
United Kingdom
Entrance to our office is on Brampton Park Road.
DX Address
Please note that from the 01/11/2021 Luqmani Thompson & Partners will no longer use the DX service. From that date please use Royal Mail postal address or preferably our main email address enq@luqmanithompson.com
Phone: 020 8365 7800
Fax: 020 8826 0169
Copyright © 2020 by Luqmani Thompson & Partners. All rights reserved.
All personnel will act in accordance with the firm’s Equality & Diversity Policy at all times.
Cookie Policy
Copyright Statement
Privacy Policy
Terms of use
Site Map
Disclaimer
Short Disclaimer
Complaints Procedure
Law Firm Website by Accesspoint Media Services
All clients are seen by appointment only. If you have a case that you would like us to take on please fill out the quick form to arrange a consultation.
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.
Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.
Please enable Strictly Necessary Cookies first so that we can save your preferences!
Litigation update: Algerian gay country guidance case
June 14, 2014
Tags:
Luqmani Thompson & Partners represented the appellant in OO (gay men: risk) Algeria [2013] UKUT 00063 (IAC), a country guidance case relating to the return of individuals fearing persecution in Algeria based on sexual orientation.
The case was heard in the Upper Tribunal which found as follows:
1. “Sodomy” and “acts against nature with a member of the same sex” are illegal under Penal Code Article 388 and 333 in Algeria and on conviction carry a criminal sentence of up to 3 years imprisonment and/or a fine.
2. Criminal prosecutions of gay men under Articles 388 and 333 are, however, extremely rare.
3. The evidence does not suggest that, as a general matter, societal and familial disapproval of male gay identity in Algeria reaches levels that are persecutory, within the meaning of Article 9 of the Qualification Directive or which otherwise reach the threshold required for protection under Article 15(b) of that Directive or Article 3 of the ECHR.
4. That conclusion is reinforced by the evidence that the admittedly small number of gay men who live openly as such in Algeria do not, in general, suffer serious harm amounting to persecution.
5. If somebody is able to establish that their behaviour was shaped by more than disapproval amounting to serious harm, they may be able to establish a need for protection. Each case should be determined on the evidence specific to that particular case.
However, on 23 January 2014, Lord Justice Maurice Kay granted permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal both in respect of the Applicant’s own case and the country guidance aspects of the case. He stated in respect of paragraph 85(c)-(e) of the Tribunal’s determination:
“The submission by Ms Chapman is that those paragraphs do not live easily with the judgment of Lord Rodger in HJ (Iran) where he considered circumstances in which homosexuals might live discreetly in their home country for mixed rather than singular reasons. Ms Chapman submits that that calls for a nuanced approach in guidance whereas that contained in paragraph 85(c)-(e) in the decision of the Tribunal is, by comparison, somewhat simplistic.
“In my judgment that is certainly an arguable criticism in a country guidance case which if applied across the board might be capable of causing injustice. It is my concern about that that has tipped me into granting permission to appeal notwithstanding the difficulties the Applicant may have in relation to his own particular case.”
Rebecca Chapman, Garden Court Chambers instructed by Ayesha Mohsin of Luqmani Thompson & Partners
11.03.2013 – One of the leading cases on the introduction of the new Immigration Rules, involving a client represented by Luqmani Thompson & Partners, has attracted widespread press coverage, including in the Law Gazette.
Related Posts
Illegal Immigration Bill March 2023
Jawaid Luqmani and Sally Thompson privileged to attend the memorial service honouring a legend in the field
Milla Walker highlights problems with refugee family reunion and ‘safe legal routes’ on BBC Radio 4
Jawaid Luqmani outlines new SRA guidance for immigration work
Milla Walker contributes to article on the shortage of legal aid lawyers for asylum seekers
Luqmani Thompson featured in Times Best Law Firms 2023 in Immigration category
Jawaid Luqmani appointed to Law Society Council October 2021
What will happen at my immigration appeal hearing?
What Home Office decisions can be appealed to the tribunal, and on what grounds?
Making an appeal against a Home Office decision